Key words: squamous cell carcinoma, oropharynx, budding, grading, prognosis, immunohistochemistry, Ki-67, p16

Ключові слова: плоскоклітинний рак, ротоглотка, брунькування, градації, прогноз, імуногістохімія, Кі-67, р16

Abstract


The World Health Organization report on the prevalence of oropharyngeal cancer (OC) places it in sixth place among men and tenth among women worldwide. A pressing problem is the increase in OC cases in recent decades among young patients, which researchers associate infection with  high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV). Among all OC, many histological forms are squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). It should be noted that HPV-associated carcinomas have a better prognosis, namely up to 20% of patients do not show recurrence after treatment, which is significantly different from the course observed in patients with HPV-unassociated OC. In the context of cancer prognosis, another important prognostic indicator is interesting - tumor budding (TB), which actively develops on the side of the invasive front of the tumor and is often described in literature as an independent factor of poor prognosis, early vascular invasion and metastasis. There are very few studies comparing the intensity of TB and HPV association for the prognosis of SCC and they mostly concern tumors of other areas of the head and neck, which determines the relevance of this work.The aim of the work is to investigate the distribution of tumor budding gradations according to clinical and morphological characteristics of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas important for prognosis, in particular, to assess the relationship of budding with HPV association (p16 status) and proliferation index (Ki-67 expression).For the study, biopsy and surgical material samples of SCC of the oropharynx of 69 patients (21 women and 48 men) who were in the oncology department of the Dnipropetrovsk Regional Clinical Hospital named after I.I. Mechnikov, Dnipro from 2019 to 2022 and received appropriate treatment were selected. The age of the patients ranged from 45 to 86 years; the average age was 64.09±8.95 years. IHC was performed according to the TermoScientific (TS) protocols with primary antibodies p16 (sp1, RTU, LabVision, USA) and Ki-67 (sp6, RTU, LabVision, USA), and the Lab Vision Quanto (TS, USA) imaging system.The distribution of TB grades according to the three-level system (from 0 to 4 cells - 1 (low), from 5 to 9 clusters – 2 (moderate), from 10 and more – 3 (high) according to clinical and morphological indicators showed a statistically significant difference only by the sex of the patients, namely the gradation of high budding levels among men was significantly higher than among women (10 out of 11 (90.91%) compared to 1 out of 11 (9.09%)), (p<0.05), this is probably due to the prevalence of such bad habits among men as smoking and alcohol abuse, which are frequent etiological causes of head and neck cancer development, as an alternative path to the development of OC without HPV infection.Distribution of TB grades in HPV-positive samples (p16 – positive) and HPV-negative (p16-negative) OC demonstrated the largest number of HPV-negative carcinomas in the subgroup with 3 budding grades, namely with grade 1 HPV-negative (p16-negative) were 59.38% of samples (19 out of 32), with grade 2 – 57.69% of samples (15 out of 26), and with grade 3 – already 90.91% of samples (10 out of 11), (p<0.05), which confirms the more unfavorable prognosis of HPV-unassociated OC.The proliferation index by Ki-67 did not show a statistically significant relationship with the distribution of TB grades, which makes the latter an independent factor in the prognosis in SCC of the oropharynx.

Реферат


Визначення градацій брунькування в плоскоклітинних раках ротоглотки. Пославська О.В., Дідовець Д.Ю., Рахманов В.В., Чекан С.М., Алєксєєнко О.А. Звіт ВООЗ про поширеність раку ротоглотки (РР) ставить його на шосту позицію серед чоловіків і десяту серед жінок у всьому світі. Актуальною проблемою є зростання кількості випадків РР за останні десятиліття серед молодих пацієнтів, що дослідники пов’язують з інфікуванням вірусом папіломи людини (ВПЛ) високого онкогенного ризику. Серед усіх РР більшість гісто­логічних форм припадає на плоскоклітинні раки (ПР). Треба зазначити, що асоційовані з ВПЛ-інфекцією карциноми мають кращий прогноз, а саме до 20% пацієнтів не демонструють рецидивів після лікування, що значно відрізняється від перебігу, який спостерігається в пацієнтів з ВПЛ-неасоційованими РР. У контексті прогнозу онкозахворювань цікавим є ще один важливий прогностичний показник – пухлинне брунькування (ПБ), що активно розвивається на боці інвазивного фронту пухлини й часто описане в літературі як незалежний фактор поганого прогнозу, ранньої судинної інвазії та метастазування. Досліджень зіставлення інтенсивності ПБ та ВПЛ-асоціації для прогнозу перебігу ПР вкрай мало і вони здебільшого стосуються пухлин інших ділянок голови та шиї, що й обумовлює актуальність цієї роботи. Мета роботи – дослідити розподіл градацій пухлинного брунькування за важливими для прогнозу клінічними та морфологічними характеристиками плоско­клітинних раків ротоглотки, зокрема оцінити зв’язок брунькування з ВПЛ-асоціацією (р16-статусом) та індексом проліферації (експресії Кі-67). Для дослідження були вибрані зразки біопсійного та операційного ма­теріалу ПР ротоглотки 69 пацієнтів (21 жінки і 48 чоловіків), що перебували в ЛОР-онкологічному відділенні КП «Дніпропетровська обласна клінічна лікарня ім. І.І. Мечникова» ДОР м. Дніпра в період з 2019 до 2022 р. та отримали відповідне лікування. Вік пацієнтів коливався в діапазоні 45-86 років, середній вік становив 64,09±8,95 року. ІГХ проводили за протоколами TermoScientific (TS) з первинними антитілами p16 (sp1, RTU, LabVision, США) та Ki-67 (sp6, RTU, LabVision, США), й системою візуалізації Lab Vision Quanto (TS, США). Розподіл градацій ПБ за трирівневою системою (від 0 до 4 клітин – 1 (низька), від 5 до 9 кластерів – 2 (помірна), від 10 і більше – 3 (висока) за клініко-морфологічними показниками показав статистично достовірну різницю тільки за статтю пацієнтів, а саме: градація високого рівня ПБ серед чоловіків виявилась значно більшою, ніж серед жінок (10 з 11 (90,91%) порівняно з 1 з 11 (9,09%)), (p<0,05), вірогідно це пов’язано з поширенням серед чоловіків таких поганих звичок, як паління та зловживання алкоголем, що є частими етіологічними причинами розвитку раків голови й шиї, як альтернативний шлях розвитку РР без ВПЛ-інфекції. Розподіл градацій ПБ у зразках ВПЛ-позитивних (р16 – позитивних) та ВПЛ-негативних (р16 – негативних) РР продемонстрував найбільшу кількість ВПЛ-негативних карцином у підгрупі з 3 градацією брунькування, а саме: з градацією 1 ВПЛ-негативними (р16-негативними) були 59,38% зразків (19 з 32), з градацією 2 – 57,69% зразків (15 з 26), і з 3 градацією – уже 90,91% зразків (10 з 11), (p<0,05), що підтверджує більш несприятливий прогноз ВПЛ-неасоційованих РР. Індекс проліферації за Кі-67 не показав статистично достовірного зв’язку з розподілом градацій ПБ, що робить його незалежним фактором прогнозу ПР ротоглотки.


Before the emergence of COVID-19, malignant tumors ranked second among the causes of death worldwide [20]. In total, in 2022, almost 20 million cases of cancer were detected in the world, with almost half of them being fatal. About 100 thousand of the recorded cases were localized in the oro­pharyngeal area [3]. In 2024 in Ukraine more than a million cancer patients were registered, almost 10 thousand with pharyngeal lesions [7]. Statistical data make it possible to understand that cancer, including oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), is a significant problem that leads to many deaths annually and requires further research.

SCC, or epidermoid carcinoma, is one of several types of malignant tumors that originate from squa­mous epithelial cells. SCC of the head and neck includes the oral cavity, oropharynx, and larynx, and is the most common malignancy arising in this area. The main risk factors are smoking, alcohol con­sumption, and high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) [6, 8, 15]. The WHO classification of head and neck tumors, fifth revision, makes a clear distinction between HPV-associated and HPV-non-associated SCCs. The existence of separate terminology for these two tumor types em­phasizes the difference in their carcinogenesis based on the potential for involvement of transcriptionally active high-risk HPVs (HPV16, HPV18, etc.) [13]. HPV E7 protein inactivation of pRb leads to over-expression of p16INK4a, making it a surrogate marker for HPV. Simi­larly, HPV E6 protein can inactivate p53 and a lower frequency of p53 mutations is observed in HPV-positive tumors. The p16 marker detects expression of the protein 16INK4a, which is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor and inhibits cell cycle progression at the G1 checkpoint without en­tering S. Loss of p16 expression due to HPV exposure (deletion, mutation or hyper­methylation) is a pathway for the develop­ment of SCC and can be used for diagnosis if polyme­rase chain reaction is too ex­pensive or not available [30].

In the context of cancer prognosis, another important prognostic indicator is interesting – TB, which actively develops on the side of the invasive front of the tumor and is often described in the literature as an independent factor of poor prognosis, early vascular invasion and metastasis. The proli­feration index is a very important indicator for determining the activity of the expansion of the invasive front of the tumor. Tumor budding is most actively manifested precisely at the invasive front, so these indicators should be interconnected. The proli­feration index can be obtained by counting the nuclei stained with the Ki-67 marker by immunohisto­chemical method. This indicator has long become the gold standard in the study of many malignant tumors.

There are very few studies comparing the intensity of TB and HPV association for the pro­gnosis of SCC and they mostly concern tumors of other areas of the head and neck, which determines the relevance of this work.

Aim of the work. To study the distribution of tumor budding gradations according to clinical and morphological characteristics of oropharyngeal squa­mous cell carcinomas important for prognosis, in particular, to assess the relationship of budding with HPV association (p16 status) and proliferation index (Ki-67 expression).

MATERIALS AND METHODS OF RESEARCH


For the study, biopsy and surgical samples of SCC of the oropharynx of 69 patients (21 women and 48 men) who were in the oncology department of the Dnipropetrovsk Regional Clinical Hospital named after I.I. Mechnikov, Dnipro, Ukraine, in the period from 2019 to 2022 and received appropriate treatment were selected. The age of the patients ranged from 45-86 years; the average age was 64.09±8.95 years. All se­lected cases were repre­sen­ted by squamous cell car­cinomas with keratinization 32 (46.38%) and without kerati­niza­tion 37 (53.62%). Clinical data on patients with SCC of the oropharynx also included information on the pre­sence of metastases and re­lapses (the distri­bu­tion of pa­tients according to clini­cal data is given in Table 1).

All patients were included in the study after providing their informed written consent. The study was conducted in accordance with the written consent of the participants and in accordance with the principles of bioethics set out in the Declaration of Helsinki "Ethical Principles of Medical Research Involving Humans" [28], the "Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UNESCO)" and national guidelines on bioethical principles of scientific research (excerpt from the protocol of the Biomedical Ethics Committee of Dnipro State Medi­cal University, No. 9 dated October 26, 2021).

Table 1. Distribution of the number of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx according to clinical data, n (%) ↓

Indicator

Clinical data SCCO

Number, n (%)

Sex of patients

Men

Women

48 (69.57)

21 (30.43)

Age of patients (years)

40-49

50-59

60-69

70-79

80-89

5 (7.25)

17 (24.63)

26 (37.68)

18 (26.09)

3 (4.35)

Histological form of SCCO

With keratinization

Without keratinization

32 (46.38)

37 (53.62)

Lymph node involvement in the neck

N (-)

N (+)

34 (49.28)

35 (50.72)

Presence of recurrences for the period from 2019 to 2022

Without recurrence

With recurrence

64 (92.75)

5 (7.25)

Total:

69 (100%)

Note. SCCO – squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. 

Ready-made histological preparations (paraffin sections 4-5 μm thick on glass slides, stained with hematoxylin and eosin) and blocks (fixed in formalin and paraffin-embedded tissues) of selected cases of SCCO for a thorough histological study were taken from the archive of the Dnipro Regional Pathological Anatomical Bureau, Dnipro, Ukraine. When asses­sing changes in the oropharyngeal mucosa, the internal control (conditional norm) was taken as a multilayered squamous epithelium that fell into the section next to the squamous cell carcinoma at the edges of the resection. Light microscopy in trans­mitted light was performed with a ZEISS "Primo Star" microscope with a Zeiss Primo Star – Axiocam ERC 5s camera (licensed ZEN 2 blue edition soft­ware for obtaining microphotographs) [27].

To obtain new sections of SCCO, adhesive Super Frost Plus slides were used for IHC. Then, deparaf­finization, rehydration, temperature unmasking of antigens, inhibition of endogenous peroxidase acti­vity, and incubation of sections with primary antibodies in humid chambers at a temperature of 23-25°C for 30 minutes were performed [17]. Primary monoclonal antibodies to the p16 oncoprotein (sp1, RTU, Lab Vision, USA) were used to detect HPV in SCCO samples, and the Ki-67 marker (sp6, RTU, Lab Vision, USA) was used to calculate the proliferation index. The Ultra Vision Quanto imaging system and the DAB chromogen (brown) were selected accor­ding to the manufacturer's protocols [17].

Evaluation of immunohistochemical staining. Ac­cording to the recommendations of the authors de Fer­reira C. et al. (2021) [5], the reaction with the p16 mar­ker in SCCO tumor cells was considered positive for HPV if it demonstrated strong diffuse nuclear-cyto­plasmic staining in more than 75% of the cells (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. A. Negative expression of p16 in the SCCO sample (HPV (-) status), IHC method, (×400). B. Positive expression of p16, diffuse nuclear-cytoplasmic staining of more than 75% of SCCO cells (HPV (+) status), IHC method, (×400) ↓

According to the recommendations of the authors Yadav P. et al. (2019) [30], the calculation of the proliferation index in SCCO samples was carried out by the expression of the Ki-67 marker as the percentage of stained cells per 1000 tumor cells in the ×400 microscope field: according to the gradations 0 (<10% of stained cells), 1 (10%-50%) and 2 (>50%). Gradations 1 and 2 were considered a positive reac­tion, 0 – a negative reaction (Fig. 2).

Statistical analysis of data was performed in the R software environment version 3.4.1 (2017-06-30) – "Single Candle" Copyright (C) 2017; The R Foun­dation for Statistical Computing Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit), which is freely distri­buted under the GNU General Public License. The signifi­cance of the difference in the study groups ac­cording to the quantitative distribution of samp­les  was determi­ned by Fisher's exact test due to small  samples. The difference was considered significant at p<0.05 [24].

Results and discussion

All observations of SCCO were divided into three groups according to the gradations of TB, according to the general recommendations used for SCC of the head and neck, namely: if there are from 0 to 4 single cells or clusters of up to 5 cells, the TB gradation was consi­dered 1 (low), from 5 to 9 clusters – 2 (mode­rate), from 10 and more – 3 (high gradation) (Fig. 3). To identify the relationship between clinical and morphological indicators of PRRG and the calculated grades of tumor budding, the number of cases was listed in Table 2.

It should be noted that both among men and women, the distribution between low and moderate gradations of TB was almost equal (20 out of 48, and 18 out of 48 for men, and 12 out of 21, and 8 out of 21 for women), but the gradation of high budding level among male patients significantly prevailed over that of female patients (10 out of 11 (90.91%) compared to 1 out of 11 (9.09%), which according to Fisher's exact test showed a sta­tistically significant difference in distribution (p<0.05).

Fig. 2. A. Gradation 1 of Ki-67 marker expression (from 10% to 50% of stained nuclei of SCCO cells), IHC method, (×400). B. Gradation 2 of Ki-67 marker expression (>50% of stained nuclei of SCCO cells), IHC method, (×400) ↓

 Low level of TB was most often found in the age groups from 50 to 59 years and from 60 to 69 years (12 out of 32, 37.50% and 10 out of 32, 31.25%, respec­ti­vely). Moderate level in the age group from 60 to 69 years (13 out of 26, 50.00%), and high in the age group from 70 to 79 years (6 out of 11, 54.55%), but no statistically significant difference was found (p>0.05).

Fig. 3. A. Absence of budding in SCCO samples (gradation 1), H-E staining, (×400). B. TB grade 1 - low (from 0 to 4 single cells or clusters up to 5 cells, yellow arrows), H-E staining, (×400). C. TB grade 2 (from 5 to 9 clusters, yellow arrows), H-E staining, (×400). D. TB grade 3 (from 10 or more single cells or clusters up to 5 cells, yellow arrows), H-E staining, (×400) ↓

High and moderate levels of TB were divided almost equally between forms with and without ke­ratinization (moderate level – 13 out of 26, 50% with keratinization and 13 out of 26, 50% without keratini­zation; high level – 6 out of 11, 54.55% with kerati­ni­zation and 5 out of 11, 45.45% without keratiniza­tion). For low level there was some difference between forms with and without keratinization (13 out of 32, 40.63% for samples with keratinization and 19 out of 32, 59.37% for samples without it without it), (p>0.05).

Table 2. Distribution of tumor budding grades of squamous cell carcinomas of oropharynx by clinical and morphological parameters, n, % ↓

Clinical and morphological data of SCCO

Quantity

n=69

(100 %)

Gradations of tumor budding, n (%)

 

1 (low)

n=32 (46.38%)

2 (moderate)

n=26 (37.68 %)

3 (high)

n=11 (15.94 %)

 

Men

Women

48 (69.57)

21 (30.43)

20 (62.50)

12 (37.50)

18 (69.23)

8 (30.77)

10 (90.91)

1 (9.09)

 

Р

p<0.05

Age (years)

average age

40-49

50-59

60-69

70-79

80-89

64.09±8.95

5 (7.25)

17 (24.63)

26 (37.68)

18 (26.09)

3 (4.35)

61.69±8.83

3 (9.38)

12 (37.50)

10 (31.25)

7 (21.87)

0 (0)

66.00±9.05

1 (3.85)

4 (15.38)

13 (50.00)

5 (19.23)

3 (11.54)

66.55±7.95

1 (9.09)

1 (9.09)

3 (27.27)

6 (54.55)

0 (0)

 

Р

p>0.05

Keratinization (+)

Keratinization (-)

32 (46.38)

37 (53.62)

13 (40.63)

19 (59.37)

13 (50.00)

13 (50.00)

6 (54.55)

5 (45.45)

 

Р

p>0,05

Metastases (-)

Metastases (+)

34 (49.28)

35 (50.72)

17 (53.13)

15 (46.87)

12 (46.15)

14 (53.85)

5 (45.45)

6 (54.55)

 

Р

p>0.05

Recurrence (-)

Recurrence (+)

64 (92.75)

5 (7.25)

29 (90.62)

3 (9.38)

25 (96.15)

1 (3.85)

10 (90.91)

1 (9.09)

 

Р

p>0.05

             

Notes: SCCO – squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, p – difference was considered significant at p<0.05, the difference between groups was assessed by Fisher’s exact test.

Almost equally there were divided the grades of TB in samples with and without metastases (low level – 17 out of 32, 53.13% without metastases and 15 out of 32, 46.87% with metastases; moderate level – 12 out of 26, 46.15% without metastases and 14 out of 26, 53.85% with metastases; high level – 5 out of 11, 45.45% without metastases and 6 out of 11, 54.55% without metastases), no statistically signi­ficant difference was found (p>0.05).

Among all three gradations of TB, cases without relapses occurred equally more often than cases with them (29 out of 32, 90.62% without relapses for low level, 25 out of 26, 96.15% for moderate and 10 out of 11, 90.91% for high), therefore, no statistically significant difference was found (p>0.05).

The next stage of our study was the calculation of the proliferation index in the areas of the invasive front and the division into gradations. The calculation of the proliferation index is most conveniently performed by IHC using nuclear expression of the Ki-67 marker, which is the gold standard for diagnosing cell division for tumors of different localizations. To identify the relationship between HPV status and proliferative activity of SCCO and calculated bud­ding grades, the number of cases with different ex­pres­sion of p16 and Ki-67 markers was listed in Table 3.

Distribution of TB grades was shifted towards HPV-negative cases (for low-level HPV-negative ca­ses were 19 out of 32 samples, 59.38%, for mode­rate TB – 15 out of 26, 57.69%, for high TB – 10 out of 11, 90.91%, respectively), which was reflected in a statistically significant difference between these sub­groups (p<0.05). Unlike p16 expression, the Ki-67 marker demonstrated a more even distribution: among all three gradations of TB, cases with grade 1 Ki-67 expression occurred equally more often than with grade 2 (25 out of 32, 78.13% for low TB, 18 out of 26, 69.23% for moderate TB, and 9 out of 11, 81.82% for high TB) and therefore no statistically significant dif­ference was found between these subgroups (p>0.05).

TB was first described in 1954 by the Japanese scientist Imai T., but it began to be used as a pro­gnostic criterion only at the beginning of the 21st century. TB is a histological indicator characterized by the presence of single tumor cells or small clusters (up to 5 cells) scattered in the stroma at various distances from the invasive growth front of a ma­lignant tumor [2; 14; 22]. TB is an important marker of an aggressive course of a malignant tumor with loss of intercellular contacts and a high probability of vascular invasion, which should be used to assess the prognosis of cancer. In many studies, the level of TB was associated with a worse prognosis for patients [4, 10, 12, 18, 26]. This is especially relevant for colo­rectal carcinomas, where this indicator is included in the WHO recommendations as mandatory when assessing the aggressiveness of cancers of this localization after numerous studies have confirmed the importance of TB in large cohorts of patients [13]. Studies of the TB process in head and neck tumors are less common, and mostly concern the oral cavity, but they also show the significance of this indicator for prognosis [1, 9, 11, 16, 19, 21-23, 25]. For example, in the study of Narayanan A. V. et al. (2025) it was determined that the level of TB is an important indi­cator, along with the degree of tumor differentiation and metastasis to the lymph nodes of the head and neck, which can be used to predict the development of SCC of the oral cavity [14].

Table 3. Distribution of budding grades of squamous cell carcinomas of oropharynx by HPV status and Ki-67 expression, n, % ↓

IHC data of SCCO

Quantity

n=69

(100 %)

Gradations of tumor budding, n (%)

1 (low)

n=32 (46.38 %)

2 (moderate)

n=26 (37.68 %)

3 (high)

n=11 (15.94 %)

HPV (+), (р16+)

HPV (-), (р16-)

25 (36.23)

44 (63.77)

13 (40.62)

19 (59.38)

11 (42.31)

15 (57.69)

1 (9.09)

10 (90.91)

Р

p<0.05

Gradations Кі-67

G 1 (10%-50%)

G 2 (>50%)

52 (75.36)

17 (24.64)

25 (78.13)

7 (21.87)

18 (69.23)

8 (30.77)

9 (81.82)

2 (18,18)

Р

p>0.05

Notes: SCCO – squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, p – difference was considered significant at p<0.05, the difference between groups was assessed by Fisher’s exact test. 

However, there are very few studies of TB grades for SCCO in general, and none in Ukraine at all, despite the large number of cases of morbidity and mortality from SCCO. In addition, there is no precise instruction for the use of TB grades for SCCO in the practice of pathologists, because the fact of using TB as a histological criterion for the prognosis of the course of SCCO in this location is poorly studied.

Information on the TB grades for head and neck cancers is found in individual publications as subjective recommendations of individual scientists. For example, Claudio Cacchi et al. (2024) suggest using the TB grades as follows: if there are 0 to 4 single cells or clusters of up to 5 cells, the TB level is 1 (low), from 5 to 9 clusters the level is 2 (mo­derate), 10 or more clusters the level is 3 (high) [2]. At the same time, Shreshtha Ghosh and Priyadarshini Guha (2023) propose a TB grade with a division only into high and low levels, where low is less than 5 buds, and high is 5 or more cells [21].

For oral cancers, the TB grades are mostly similar to the option from the study by Claudio Cacchi et al. (2024), namely in the studies of Anand Vijaya Na­rayanan et al. (2025), or Nan Xie et al. (2016) used the budding gradations as follows: if there are from 0 to 4 single cells or clusters of up to 5 cells, the level of TB is 1 (low), from 5 to 9 clusters the level is 2 (moderate), 10 or more clusters the level is 3 (high) [2; 14; 26]. But for SCCO such information was not found.

In this work, for the first time for our region, the distribution of TB gradations of SCCO was analyzed with regard to sex, age, histological form, regional lymph node involvement and relapses after treatment. For the first time, an analysis of the relationship between HPV status and proliferative activity of SCCO according to TB grades was performed to determine the significance of the latter in the pro­gnosis of tumors this localization.

CONCLUSION


1. The distribution of tumor budding grades accor­ding to the three-level system (from 0 to 4 cells – 1 (low), from 5 to 9 clusters – 2 (moderate), from 10 and more – 3 (high) according to clinical and morpho­logical indicators showed a statistically significant difference only by the sex of the patients, namely the gradation of high budding levels among men was significantly higher than among women (10 out of 11 (90.91%) compared to 1 out of 11 (9.09%), (p<0.05), this is probably due to the prevalence of such bad habits among men as smoking and alcohol abuse, which are frequent etiological causes of head and neck cancer development, as an alternative path to the development of oropharyngeal cancer without human papillomavirus infection.

2. The distribution of tumor budding grades in human papillomavirus-positive samples (p16-posi­tive) and human papillomavirus-negative (p16-nega­tive) oropharyngeal cancer demonstrated the largest number of human papillomavirus-negative carcino­mas in the subgroup with 3 budding grades, namely with grade 1 human papillomavirus-negative (p16-negative) were 59.38% of samples (19 out of 32), with grade 2 – 57.69% of samples (15 out of 26), and with grade 3 – already 90.91% of samples (10 out of 11), (p<0.05), which confirms the more unfavorable pro­gnosis of HPV-unassociated oropharyngeal cancer.

3. The Ki-67 proliferation index did not show a statistically significant relationship with the distri­bution oftumor budding grades, which makes the latter an independent factor in the prognosis ofs quamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx.

Prospects for further research. Continuation of studying tumor budding process in squamous cell carcinoma of other locations is promising and has not yet been studied enough to identify additional prognostic criteria.

Contributors:

Poslavska O.V. – conceptualization, methodolo­gy, formal analysis;

Didovets D.Y. – investigation, resources, wri­ting – original draft;

Rakhmanov V.V. – data curation, validation;

Chekan S.M. – writing – review & editing, super­vision;

Alekseenko O.A. – project administration, fun­ding acquisition.

Funding. This research received no external funding.

Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES


1. Barman S, Ahuja S, Kumar R, Zaheer S. Progno­stic significance of tumor budding in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: association with clinico­patho­logical features. Surgical and Experimental Pathology. 2025;8(7):1-6.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42047-025-00181-9

2. Cacchi C, Fischer HJ, Wermker K, Rashad A, Jonigk DD, Hölzle F, et al. New Tumor Budding Eva­luation in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan30;16(3):587. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16030587 

3. Cancer Today. Global Cancer Observatory [Inter­net]. 2025 [cited 2025 Sep 11]. Available from: https://gco.iarc.who.int/today/en   

4. Chu J, Kim HS, DO SI. Clinicopathological Sig­ni­ficance and Predictive Value of High Intratumoral Tumor Bud­ding in Patients With Breast Carcinoma Treated With Ne­oadjuvant Chemotherapy. Anticancer Res. 2023;43(5):2323-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.16397

5. de Ferreira C, Dufloth R, de Carvalho AC, Reis RM, Santana I, Carvalho RS, et al. Correlation of p16 immunohistochemistry with clinical and epidemiological features in oropharyngeal squamous-cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0253418. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253418

6. Ebrahimi E, Sangphukieo A, Park HA, Gabo­rieau V, Ferreiro-Iglesias A, Diergaarde B, et al. Cross-ancestral GWAS identifies 29 variants across head and neck cancer subsites. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):8787. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63842-z  

7. Fedorenko Z, Gorokh Y, Ryzhov A, Soumkina O. Can­cer in Ukraine, 2023 – 2024. Incidence, mortality, preva­lence and other relevant statistics. Bulletin of the National Cancer Registry of Ukraine. 2025;26:62. Available from: http://www.ncru.inf.ua/publications/BULL_26/index_e.htm

8. Johnson DE, Burtness B, Leemans CR, Lui VWY, Bauman JE, Grandis JR. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020 Nov 26;6(1):92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-020-00224-3

9. Kale AD, Angadi PV. Tumor budding is a po­tential histopathological marker in the prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: Current status and future prospects. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2019;23(3):318-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_331_19

10. Kawachi H, Eishi Y, Ueno H, Nemoto T, Fujimo­ri T, Iwashita A, et al. A three-tier classification system based on the depth of submucosal invasion and bud­ding/sprouting can improve the treatment strategy for T1 colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study. Mod Pathol. 2015;28(6):872-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2015.36  

11. Lugli A, Zlobec I, Berger MD, Kirsch R, Nag­tegaal ID. Tumour budding in solid cancers. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021;18(2):101-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-020-0422-y

12. Masuda R, Kijima H, Imamura N, Aruga N, Naka­mura Y, Masuda D, et al. Tumor budding is a significant indicator of a poor prognosis in lung squamous cell carcinoma patients. Mol Med Rep. 2012;6(5):937-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2012.1048

13. Nagtegaal ID, Odze RD, Klimstra D, Paradis V, Rugge M, Schirmacher P, et al. The 2019 WHO classi­fication of tumours of the digestive system. Histo­pathology. 2020 Jan;76(2):182-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13975

14. Narayanan AV, Umashankar K, Aravind S, Naya­nar SK, Vijay S. Tumor Budding as an Independent Prognostic Histopathological Marker in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma – An Indian Tertiary Care Center Experience. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2025;41(2):31-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.5146/tjpath.2025.13761

15. National cancer institute. Dictionary of Cancer Terms. Squamous cell carcinoma [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Nov 11]. Available from:  https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/squamous-cell-carcinoma-of-the-head-and-neck

16. Niranjan KC, Raj M, Hallikeri K. Prognostic evaluation of tumour budding in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Evidenced by CD44 expression as a cancer stem cell marker. Pathol Res Pract. 2023;251:154883. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2023.154883

17. Nguyen T. Immunohistochemistry: A Technical Guide to Current Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2022.

18. Okcu O, Şen B, Aşkan G, Öztürk Ç, Öztürk SD, Bedir R. Tumor Budding is an Independent Prognostic Factor to Predict Overall Survival in Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study. Int J Surg Pathol. 2023;31(1):26-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/10668969221116541   

19. Omae T, Omori Y, Makihara Y, Yamanegi K, Hanawa S, Yoshikawa K, et al. Mechanism of Tumor Budding in Patient-Derived Metachronous Oral Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(7):3347. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073347  

20. Our World in Data. Causes of death, World [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2025 Sep 13]. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/squamous-cell-carcinoma-of-the-head-and-neck

21. Shreshtha Ghosh, Priyadarshini Guha. Evaluation of Tumour Budding in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Its Relationship with other Histological Parameters of Prognosis. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Biology. 2023;8(3):203-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcb.2023.8.3.203-209

22. Silva FFVE, Caponio VCA, Pérez-Sayáns M, Pa­dín-Iruegas ME, Mascitti M, Chamorro-Petronacci CM, et al. Tumor budding is a prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A comprehensive meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2024;193:104202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104202

23. Stögbauer F, Beck S, Ourailidis I, Hess J, Po­remba C, Lauterbach M, et al. Tumour budding-based gra­ding as independent prognostic biomarker in HPV-positive and HPV-negative head and neck cancer. Br J Cancer. 2023;128(12):2295-306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-023-02240-y 

24. Strakhova OP, Androsov OI. [Statistical methods of processing the results of medical and biological research: educational and methodological manual]. Lviv: Vydavets Marchenko T.V.; 2021. Ukrainian.

25. Togni L, Caponio VCA, Zerman N, Troiano G, Zhurakivska K, Lo Muzio L, et al. The Emerging Impact of Tumor Budding in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Main Issues and Clinical Relevance of a New Prognostic Marker. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(15):3571. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153571  

26. Unal B, Celik MY, Gedik EO, Bassorgun CI, El­pek GO. Tumor budding as a potential prognostic marker in determining the behavior of primary liver cancers. World J Hepatol. 2023;15(6):775-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v15.i6.775

27. Vareniuk IM, Dzerzhynskyi ME. [Methods of cyto-histological diagnosis]. Kyiv: Interservis; 2019 [cited 2025 Sep 13]. Ukrainian. Available from: https://biomed.knu.ua/institute-activity/educational/­kafedry/kafedra-cytology/library-cytology/3046-metodi-tsito-gistologichnoji-diagnostiki-navchalnij-posibnik.html

28. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053

29. Xie N, Yu P, Liu H, Liu X, Hou J, Chen X, et al. Validation of the International Tumor Budding Con­sensus Conference (2016) recommendations in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 2019;48(6):451-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12856

30. Yadav P, Malik R, Balani S, Nigam RK, Jain P, Tan­don P. Expression of p-16, Ki-67 and p-53 markers in dys­plastic and malignant lesions of the oral cavity and oro­pharynx. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2019 May-Aug;23(2):224-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_299_18